Please register or login. There are 2 registered and 832 anonymous users currently online. Current bandwidth usage: 2196.53 kbit/s November 08 - 02:12am EST 
Hardware Analysis
      
Forums Product Prices
  Contents 
 
 

  Latest Topics 
 

More >>
 

    
 
 

  You Are Here: 
 
/ Forums / General Technology /
 

  AMD 64 Fx Vs. Intel p4 3.2 Ghz ht Extreme Edition 
 
 Author 
 Date Written 
 Tools 
adam mcgillis Jan 14, 2004, 05:58pm EST Reply - Quote - Report Abuse
Private Message - Add to Buddy List Replies: 6 - Views: 35
Which one is a better chip... there both competatively priced



current rig
--Core 2 Duo ee6600
--eVGA 680i
--2 Gbs pc6400 w/epp corsair xms
-- xfx 8800Gtx xxx 630/1000
--x-fi extreme gamer edition
-- 400 gig seagate w/8 mb cache 7200 rpm
--650 watt thermaltake tough power
-- asus vento 3600 casue red
Want to enjoy less advertisements and more features? Click here to become a Hardware Analysis registered user.
Salman A. Jan 14, 2004, 06:05pm EST Reply - Quote - Report Abuse
Private Message - Add to Buddy List  
>> Re: AMD 64 Fx Vs. Intel p4 3.2 Ghz ht Extreme Edition
Now, you have to understand this, the athlon 64 bit, might even perform WORSE then a regular p4 without ht. How is this? Well, some programs that use really low cache, such as word processors may perform slower on the 64 bit. Me, I would buy the P4 with HT, it just.... well....seems better. I personally like Intel better than Athlon. I may not be right but, hey...

Im only 13 and im a computer geek! Im supposed to play outside and watch T.V! PLEASE visit my website http://www.salmanswebsite.tk
Carter Sudeith Jan 14, 2004, 07:27pm EST Reply - Quote - Report Abuse
Private Message - Add to Buddy List  
>> Re: AMD 64 Fx Vs. Intel p4 3.2 Ghz ht Extreme Edition
Low performance in word processing??? Hahahaha!!! Man, that 64-bit notepad is so fast! Wow! Hahaha! Go for the A64 3400+, it's only $400 and it outperforms the FX in most tests. P4 better than A64? NEVER!!!
Oh and Salman, I hear you. I was once a 13 year old computer geek. Now I'm a 14 year old computer geek (who rakes in $3000 a month from selling computers)!

Salman A. Jan 14, 2004, 07:55pm EST Reply - Quote - Report Abuse
Private Message - Add to Buddy List  
>> Re: AMD 64 Fx Vs. Intel p4 3.2 Ghz ht Extreme Edition
No really man it's true, on techtv, the screensavers they explained about how a 32 bit program might slow down a 64bit. And, I would sell computers, but... im noyl 13 unlike 14.

Im only 13 and im a computer geek! Im supposed to play outside and watch T.V! PLEASE visit my website http://www.salmanswebsite.tk
Lawrence Heffernan Jan 15, 2004, 11:14am EST Reply - Quote - Report Abuse
Private Message - Add to Buddy List

Edited: Jan 15, 2004, 11:19am EST

 
>> Re: AMD 64 Fx Vs. Intel p4 3.2 Ghz ht Extreme Edition
This is still x86. x86-64bit is not slower than x86-32bit. The Athlon's do not use their 64bit extensions yet (due to the lack of O/S support at the moment, microsoft is still finishing XP64bit). the new Business winstone and content creation winstone puts the Athlon 64's ahead of the Pentium 4's. Also, at games, The Pentium 4 Extreme Edition is beaten, look at some reviews. Next you'll be saying a 2.6GHz celeron is faster than a 1.8GHz Duron

And, although the Athlon XP beat the Pentium 4 at Word Processing and business applications, why would you need extra FPS in Word, so what, It runs well on a Athlon 600 with 64mb of ram, it won't run much faster on a 1.4GHz ThunderBird with 128Mb ram, and the speed increase won't be noticeable between that and a Prometia cooled Athlon 64 FX57.

tom Jan 15, 2004, 01:32pm EST Reply - Quote - Report Abuse
Private Message - Add to Buddy List  
>> Re: AMD 64 Fx Vs. Intel p4 3.2 Ghz ht Extreme Edition
Oh for f*ck's sake, this is getting sad

You're comparing speed of business documents on the Athlon 64 and P4?????

There is NO NOTICEABLE DIFFERENCE in speed between them running that type of thing at all so SHUT UP TALKING ABOUT IT

MY INTEL CELERON PC DOES BUSINESS DOCUMENTS FAST AND THAT'S FECKING 550MHZ!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Salman A. Jan 15, 2004, 02:45pm EST Reply - Quote - Report Abuse
Private Message - Add to Buddy List  
>> Re: AMD 64 Fx Vs. Intel p4 3.2 Ghz ht Extreme Edition
Yeah, I guess your right. I mean even if a program does load 0.000000000000004 seconds faster than the other. lol

Im only 13 and im a computer geek! Im supposed to play outside and watch T.V! PLEASE visit my website http://www.salmanswebsite.tk

Write a Reply >>


 

    
 
 

  Topic Tools 
 
RSS UpdatesRSS Updates
 

  Related Articles 
 
 

  Newsletter 
 
A weekly newsletter featuring an editorial and a roundup of the latest articles, news and other interesting topics.

Please enter your email address below and click Subscribe.