Please register or login. There are 1 registered and 997 anonymous users currently online. Current bandwidth usage: 487.98 kbit/s May 16 - 06:43pm EDT 
Hardware Analysis
      
Forums Product Prices
  Contents 
 
 

  Latest Topics 
 

More >>
 

    
 
 

  You Are Here: 
 
/ Forums / HyperTransport Technology Consortium Founded
 

  Kudos for getting the HyperTransport Consortium up 
 
 Author 
 Date Written 
 Tools 
Robert Kropiewnicki Jul 27, 2001, 05:29pm EDT Reply - Quote - Report Abuse
Private Message - Add to Buddy List Replies: 3 - Views: 362
This is what I call a step in the right direction for AMD. The fact that companies like Sun and Cisco would use their technology in business machines is an important step towards changing their image as purely an "enthusiast" company. Granted, it would be nice from a bottom line stand point if they were making money from it as well but all in all this is still a good thing.


Want to enjoy fewer advertisements and more features? Click here to become a Hardware Analysis registered user.
Robert Kropiewnicki Jul 27, 2001, 05:35pm EDT Reply - Quote - Report Abuse
Private Message - Add to Buddy List  
>> HyperTransport and the Intel irony.......
It should be noted that Intel will end up helping the use of HyperTransport as Microsoft's X-Box will have a Pentium 3 processor on an nVidia system board utilizing HyperTransport.

Be interesting to see how much Intel does in helping promote the X-Box in light of this.

Brendan Harnett Aug 10, 2001, 11:49am EDT Reply - Quote - Report Abuse
Private Message - Add to Buddy List  
>> [No Subject]
Yes, but Intel has decided to push forward on 3GIO, and AMD has decided to work with them to that end, rather than agaist them. It's strange when these companies that are locked in a death match codevelope process technologies and support each other's initiatives.

Robert Kropiewnicki Aug 10, 2001, 12:43pm EDT Reply - Quote - Report Abuse
Private Message - Add to Buddy List  
>> [No Subject]
That's probably the most interesting thing about this.......AMD has decided that they weren't going to position HyperTransport as a PCI replacement. In fact, they are a member of the PCI-SIG and voted in favor of 3GIO as the standard to replace PCI. Yet, Intel seems determined to position 3GIO as a direct competitor to HyperTransport.

I find this reasoning strange for two reasons. First, 3GIO is at least two years off as it is. By them, we'll probably have at least one revision of HyperTransport. How do you position a product that's at least two, perhaps three years off from arriving against technology that will be actively used once nForce is officially released? Moore's Law alone should be enough to make this kind of thinking useless. This brings me to my second point.

There seems to be this idea among members of the media, and even the head of PCI-SIG, that HyperTransport as a technology could very well have been a possible PCI replacement if AMD had decided to go that route. If it would be as seemingly simple as some have suggested, why would Intel want to antagonize a company that has a product out that only needs advising when they're a long way off from actually releasing their own product. Something about not waking sleeping bears comes to mind.....


Write a Reply >>


 

    
 
 

  Topic Tools 
 
RSS UpdatesRSS Updates
 

  Related Articles 
 
 

  Newsletter 
 
A weekly newsletter featuring an editorial and a roundup of the latest articles, news and other interesting topics.

Please enter your email address below and click Subscribe.