Please register or login. There are 0 registered and 1245 anonymous users currently online. Current bandwidth usage: 326.30 kbit/s December 11 - 08:42am EST 
Hardware Analysis
      
Forums Product Prices
  Contents 
 
 

  Latest Topics 
 

More >>
 

    
 
 

  You Are Here: 
 
/ Forums / SnapServer 4100 Review
 

  Snap Servers seem to be very expensive for IDE disk capacity. 
 
 Author 
 Date Written 
 Tools 
ua549 May 11, 2001, 04:41pm EDT Reply - Quote - Report Abuse
Private Message - Add to Buddy List Replies: 5 - Views: 1371
Snap Servers seem to be very expensive for IDE disk capacity. A quick check revealed that a highly discounted 80GB Snap Server costs about US$1,200. It contains two 40 gig IDE drives. A much faster 80 gig SCSI Ultra 160 drive can be added to an existing SCSI string for less money than the IDE solution.

I have trouble visualizing 2 IDE drives, a $75 system board and a Linux or Free BSD OS installation being worth $1,200. I guess convenience is worth something.

I'd hate to require an Ethernet node for each 80 gig of storage on any of my client sites. Imagine a single Ultra 160 SCSI bus full of Seagate 180 GB drives. That's 2.7 TB / 80 GB = 34 Snap Servers for one full SCSI bus. Hmmmm.


Want to enjoy fewer advertisements and more features? Click here to become a Hardware Analysis registered user.
keboman May 11, 2001, 04:47pm EDT Reply - Quote - Report Abuse
Private Message - Add to Buddy List  
>> [No Subject]
Well, if you consider the cost of having someone come in and setup a system like that, and the cost of maintaing the system it seems like a good deal. If you were running a business, I don't think spending $1,200 for something relatively maintenance free and reliable is a big issue.

Kebo

ua549 May 11, 2001, 05:05pm EDT Reply - Quote - Report Abuse
Private Message - Add to Buddy List  
>> [No Subject]
Maintaining one string of SCSI drive is much less expensive than maintaining a string of 34 Ethernet Snap Servers, cables and Ethernet switch ports. An IDE drive (300,000 hrs MTBF) will fail on average 4 times for each SCSI drive failure (1,200,000 hrs MTBF). Don't forget to include the cost of a commercial quality Ethernet switch required for the Snap Servers. A Cisco Catalyst 2948G switch costs about $4200 discounted.

What you say makes sense for a tiny business. I just don't think the capacity and complexity of a Snap Server is worth it for only 80GB storage. Grade school kids build that much storage into the PCs they build with their summer allowances.

keboman May 11, 2001, 05:10pm EDT Reply - Quote - Report Abuse
Private Message - Add to Buddy List  
>> [No Subject]
And who says it isn't target towards a tiny business? It seems more like a Home office/small business product to me...

keboman May 11, 2001, 05:21pm EDT Reply - Quote - Report Abuse
Private Message - Add to Buddy List  
>> [No Subject]
Sorry, I don't mean to sound rude.

Kebo

Zaphod May 11, 2001, 05:26pm EDT Reply - Quote - Report Abuse
Private Message - Add to Buddy List  
>> [No Subject]
Linksys makes a few boxes like this that are less expensive. I have several businesses that wouldn't have a server at all if these were available a couple years ago. Basic file and print services aren't always required in large amounts. And the major benefit of these appliances I think is that they are free of licensing charges.


Write a Reply >>


 

    
 
 

  Topic Tools 
 
RSS UpdatesRSS Updates
 

  Related Articles 
 
 

  Newsletter 
 
A weekly newsletter featuring an editorial and a roundup of the latest articles, news and other interesting topics.

Please enter your email address below and click Subscribe.