Please register or login. There are 0 registered and 1221 anonymous users currently online. Current bandwidth usage: 326.30 kbit/s December 16 - 11:54am EST 
Hardware Analysis
      
Forums Product Prices
  Contents 
 
 

  Latest Topics 
 

More >>
 

    
 
 

  You Are Here: 
 
/ Forums / Daily Column, August 15th
 

  Choosing a motherboard - Daily Column, August 15th 
 
 Author 
 Date Written 
 Tools 
Darren Krape Aug 15, 2001, 01:15am EDT Reply - Quote - Report Abuse
Private Message - Add to Buddy List Replies: 1 - Views: 1230
I figure I might as well throw my two cents in here as I just bought a new motherboard a few weeks ago. I ended up buying an Iwill KK266-R (check out the KK266Plus review as they are nearly the same board) for a few reasons. Although definitely a consideration, speed was not the prevailing reason for my decision. In most of the benchmarks I have seen the KK266 has performed admirably, though perhaps not always at the top it has never been particularly far off from the leader. My main focus when choosing the new board was a balance of stability (my previous motherboard, an Abit BE-6, had a few problems in this regard), feature set (support for an AMD 1.4mhz CPU, a decent number of PCI slots, ect). reliability, speed, and price. In the end I decided to spend the 10 extra dollars to get the RAID board as I wanted to have that option available to me even if I never use it. Onboard audio was never really a consideration in my choice as I vastly prefer my SoundBlaster Live! Platinum to any other sound option I have used thus far.

All things considered, the only major caveat I have with the board would have to be the manual. Though everything is fairly well laid out and understandable with several clear and concise diagrams, the spelling is simply horrendous. On a single page one can easily pick out two to three gross spelling errors. Even errors on simple words like "mouse" and "your," errors that any quick spell check would have certainly fixed. I have not had to utilize their tech support thus far, so in that respect I reserve judgment for those who have.

Darren Krape
Chief Graphics Designer, Hardware Analysis.com
Email: dkrape@hardwareanalysis.com
Visit us at: http://www.hardwareanalysis.com


Darren Krape

Chief Graphics Designer
dkrape@hardwareanalysis.com
http://www.darrenkrape.com
#hardwareanalysis on newnet.net
Want to enjoy fewer advertisements and more features? Click here to become a Hardware Analysis registered user.
Sander Sassen Aug 15, 2001, 03:39am EDT Reply - Quote - Report Abuse
Private Message - Add to Buddy List  
>> [No Subject]
Hmm,

I'm a sucker for stability, I'd go with the more stable motherboard any day, even if that means paying a price premium. As for integrated stuff on the motherboard, take for example Tyan's Thunder K7, nice motherboard, lots of intergrated stuff, would do nice in a server. But for me I'd rather have the option of choosing my own parts, especially things like SCSI controllers, NICs etc. Therefore the Tiger K7 is much more appealing to me simply because it only has the bare essentials.

As for RAID and onboard sound, I think RAID is a good thing to have as it only adds a few $$$ to the price, and I might use it now or in the near future to solve some of the disk I/O bottleneck. Onboard sound is another thing, although some solutions offers a really good implementation, for example Analog Devices's SoundMax 3.0 the usual AC-97 stuff isn't good enough for me, and I always choose a Live!.

As for performance, I think a motherboard's performance is firstly dependant on the chipset used, you can't make a Ferrari out of a Volkswagen, secondly on the board layout, you can't drive 120Mph on a wiggly, wobbly road, and lastly on the BIOS, someone has to tune that Ferrari's engine to make it go fast right? Pardon the analogies, but these three factors determine, for the most part, a motherboards performance.

Considering the fact that most motherboards closely follow the guidelines given by the chipset manufacturer for their board layout you won't see huge differences in performance there, as most manufacturers will more or less adhere to those. The BIOS however can be tweaked, with more stringent timings, less wait-states, etc. however this usually means that we'll reach a point where the thin line between performance and stability is crossed and we then end up with a fast, but unstable motherboard.

As with BX motherboards at some point you stop looking at performance but rather start caring about more/better features, quality of components used, board layout. I think the same holds true for most motherboards featuring chipsets that have already had every last bit of performance extracted from them, as with the Via KT133A. New chipsets will probably bring better performance, but new motherboards based on them will quickly become non-distinquishable from one another after the BIOS has been tweaked and upgraded over time.

That's my take on the matter, but like I said, I'm all for stability, performance is second.

Best regards,

Sander Sassen

CEO, Hardware Analysis
Email: ssassen@hardwareanalysis.com
Visit us at: http://www.hardwareanalysis.com

Sander Sassen
Editor in Chief - Hardware Analysis
ssassen@hardwareanalysis.com

Write a Reply >>


 

    
 
 

  Topic Tools 
 
RSS UpdatesRSS Updates
 

  Related Articles 
 
 

  Newsletter 
 
A weekly newsletter featuring an editorial and a roundup of the latest articles, news and other interesting topics.

Please enter your email address below and click Subscribe.