Please register or login. There are 1 registered and 995 anonymous users currently online. Current bandwidth usage: 130.85 kbit/s December 04 - 01:18am EST 
Hardware Analysis
      
Forums Product Prices
  Contents 
 
 

  Latest Topics 
 

More >>
 

    
 
 

  You Are Here: 
 
/ Forums / NVIDIA's TurboCache, buzzword or hot new feature?
 

  Video Card Memory 
 
 Author 
 Date Written 
 Tools 
JOhn Bobbitt Dec 23, 2004, 12:25am EST Reply - Quote - Report Abuse
Private Message - Add to Buddy List Replies: 5 - Views: 78
Here's my question - why dont we have the option anymore to put our own memory on video cards nowadays. Old video cards usedta let us do that, and now they are using system memory for video cards across the PCIX bus, so why not give us slots on our video cards where we can drop our own 256, 512, or 1GB DIMMS?


Want to enjoy less advertisements and more features? Click here to become a Hardware Analysis registered user.
Sean B Dec 23, 2004, 07:26pm EST Reply - Quote - Report Abuse
Private Message - Add to Buddy List

Edited: Dec 23, 2004, 07:27pm EST

 
>> Re: Video Card Memory
The embedded memory is directly pipelined ball grid array ram.

If you were to throw it on a DIMM, it would defeat the purpose.


Besides, software doesn't even take advantage of the memory graphics cards have now, so why do you think 1GB would be any better?

JOhn Bobbitt Dec 28, 2004, 04:07pm EST Reply - Quote - Report Abuse
Private Message - Add to Buddy List  
>> Re: Video Card Memory
I agree with you, but my initial post was in regards to the new Radeons using the PCI-X bus to leverage system RAM as video memory. In that case, it would still be faster to have DIMMs local to the card than on the system board, going over the bus, no?

Sean B Dec 28, 2004, 04:13pm EST Reply - Quote - Report Abuse
Private Message - Add to Buddy List  
>> Re: Video Card Memory
Slightly lower latency, but then you have to weigh in the realestate on the card.

James Marlin Dec 28, 2004, 04:44pm EST Reply - Quote - Report Abuse
Private Message - Add to Buddy List  
>> Re: Video Card Memory
Are you suggesting that video cards start using a system similar to how L2 cache' used to be on the main board and not the CPU? With the very early ones being slot, instead of BG?
Basically that's how it would work, because the new concept your referring to (I think), is where manufactures are going to reduce the on board video card memory to a cache' and have the card use all the extra PCIe bandwidth to fetch information from system memory. This will reduce video card costs quite a lot.

Ok just off the top of my head
Will this sort of concept reduce the on board video bandwidth any? I would assume it would, since at the very least there would be over head using a slot based system as apposed to BG.
It's been proved with the move to on die L2 that it's the speed and bandwidth as much as the amount of memory where cache' performance is concerned, so it might not help any, and could hurt.

Plus what about weight and cooling?

Still it's an interesting idea, over all.

Athlon XP M 2500+ (12x200FSB=2.4 ghz, PR 3500+), Soltek SL-75RN2-L, 1gig 3200DDR Ram, ATI X800GTO, NEC MultiSync FE991sb, Creative Audigy OEM, Logitech 5.1 speakers, 40gig HD booting XP, 200gig@50%games, Lite-On DVD burner, LG 52x32x52x
Sean B Dec 28, 2004, 05:51pm EST Reply - Quote - Report Abuse
Private Message - Add to Buddy List  
>> Re: Video Card Memory
It would rape bandwidth, motherboard realestate, and latency..... so it's out of the question.

I did come up with a concept I'm going to mail to Intel that would put them on top in the gaming hardware industry. Unfortunately, they don't accept proposals via e-mail for legality.... so it might take a while.


Write a Reply >>


 

    
 
 

  Topic Tools 
 
RSS UpdatesRSS Updates
 

  Related Articles 
 
 

  Newsletter 
 
A weekly newsletter featuring an editorial and a roundup of the latest articles, news and other interesting topics.

Please enter your email address below and click Subscribe.