Please register or login. There are 2 registered and 963 anonymous users currently online. Current bandwidth usage: 331.23 kbit/s July 05 - 07:30am EDT 
Hardware Analysis
      
Forums Product Prices
  Contents 
 
 

  Latest Topics 
 

More >>
 

    
 
 

  You Are Here: 
 
/ Forums / Windows XP, 2000, 98 /
 

  is it me ? 
 
 Author 
 Date Written 
 Tools 
duncan bladen May 14, 2008, 03:39pm EDT Reply - Quote - Report Abuse
Send Message - Add to Buddy List Replies: 14 - Views: 184
i just downloaded and installed sp3 for xp , and my machine seems faster ?



Want to enjoy less advertisements and more features? Click here to become a Hardware Analysis registered user.
Vitaliy (Administrator) May 14, 2008, 03:56pm EDT Reply - Quote - Report Abuse
Send Message - Add to Buddy List  
>> Re: is it me ?
duncan bladen said:
i just downloaded and installed sp3 for xp , and my machine seems faster ?

Not just you.

Adam Kolak May 14, 2008, 04:32pm EDT Reply - Quote - Report Abuse
Send Message - Add to Buddy List  
>> Re: is it me ?
Yes, I have seen somewhere that there is supposed to be a 10% improvement in performance over SP2 overall. Service Packs generally increase security, fix issues, and improve performance.

Adam Kolak
Moderator - Hardware Analysis
Email: adam@hardwareanalysis.com
DFI LP DK P35-T2RS | Xeon Quad @ 3.2Ghz | 4GB DDR2-1000 | 8800GT 512MB | See Profile
Meats of Evil May 14, 2008, 10:43pm EDT Reply - Quote - Report Abuse
Send Message - Add to Buddy List  
>> Re: is it me ?
Really? You care to post the link of the download? Last time I checked many people had SP3 but Microsoft hadn't officially released it since from what I understand it's still not complete, but from what I've read there's a Final Candidate Version release that supposedly is closed to finished and working fully.

Antec 900 Case
Windows XP Home Edition
Q6600 G0 @ 3.2ghz / Zalman 9500
Evga 680i NF-68 T1
OCZ x2Gb SLI DDR2@800/ 4-4-4-12-1t timings
8800gt @ 700/1750/975
OCZ GameXStream 700w
Seagate160gb,Hitachi 260gb HD
X-fi Xtreme Music
3DMark06(Free)-14,439
Juggernaut May 14, 2008, 11:58pm EDT Reply - Quote - Report Abuse
Send Message - Add to Buddy List  
>> Re: is it me ?
Hmmm I wodner if you have to re activate after installing this.

SYSTEM SPECS:
Intel Core 2 Duo E6750 4MB cache @ 3.2GHz - Asus P5KC 1333FSB DDR3 - G.Skill PK Series 2x1GB 4-4-4-12 800MHz - MSI 7600GT @ 620/1560 - Silverstone Strider ST60F 600W Quad 12V Rails - 2 x Seagate 7200.9 160GB SATAIIs - Vista Ultimate
john albrich May 15, 2008, 12:57am EDT Reply - Quote - Report Abuse
Send Message - Add to Buddy List  
>> Re: is it me ?
Meats of Evil said:
Really? You care to post the link of the download? Last time I checked many people had SP3 but Microsoft hadn't officially released it since from what I understand it's still not complete, but from what I've read there's a Final Candidate Version release that supposedly is closed to finished and working fully.


Discussion of various SP3 releases and version 5512 v. hypothetical FINAL final version 5573
http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/70645/

in particular...reference to Microsoft SP3 release listed as "Final" with NO "RC" designation at the time of the post. Version Hashes were equal to 5512 version.
http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/70645/#534938

Brendan Gonsalves May 15, 2008, 03:00am EDT Reply - Quote - Report Abuse
Send Message - Add to Buddy List  
>> Re: is it me ?
Is it the final version?

If so please post a link. I don't want to download an older SP3 update.

Thanks.

AMD A64 3000+ s754 @ 2.35GHz
Zalman CNPS9500
Asus K8N nForce3
Sapphire X1950 Pro
OCZ 2GB @ DDR480
Enermax Liberty 400W
XP Pro x86
duncan bladen May 15, 2008, 05:55am EDT Reply - Quote - Report Abuse
Send Message - Add to Buddy List  
>> Re: is it me ?
i turned my pc on , and it downloaded sp3 - but i had trouble trying to install , because i had modified the boot ini file - [to change the boot screen] , but it is genuine - you dont have to re activate or anything - i had to remove bootxp , and it installed ok , heres the link..http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=5b33b5a8-5e76-401f-be08-1e1555d4f3d4&DisplayLang=en


john albrich May 15, 2008, 08:17am EDT Reply - Quote - Report Abuse
Send Message - Add to Buddy List

Edited: May 15, 2008, 10:59am EDT

 
>> No Difference Between SP3 of 24April2008(ver5512) and 06May2008
duncan bladen said:
i turned my pc on , and it downloaded sp3 - but i had trouble trying to install , because i had modified the boot ini file - [to change the boot screen] , but it is genuine - you dont have to re activate or anything - i had to remove bootxp , and it installed ok , heres the link..http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=5b33b5a8-5e76-401f-be08-1e1555d4f3d4&DisplayLang=en


There is NO difference between this "new" SP3 file and the "Windows XP SP3 final RTM version 5.1.2600.5512" file Microsoft first made available 24April2008. (RTM=Release To Manufacturing)
Reminder: recommend performing a total disk backup before installing any new Service Pack. A freeware program, DriveImageXML is an reliable, fast, and easy-to-use program. DriveImage XML runs under Windows XP, Windows Server 2003 and Windows Vista only. The program will backup, image and restore drives formatted with FAT 12, 16, 32 and NTFS. http://www.runtime.org/driveimage-xml.htm
If you are using non-Windows/encrypted partitions, you may need to use a disk imaging program like XXclone
http://www.majorgeeks.com/XXCLONE_d5534.html
http://www.xxclone.com/index.htm



I just a few minutes ago, downloaded and compared this (apparently) 06May2008 file* and the 24April2008 file. I performed bit-by-bit, MD5 hash, and SHA-1 hash compares. All 3 parameters were identical.
Windows XP SP3 final RTM version 5.1.2600.5512
Hashes that I calculated for
XP_SP3Ver5512RTM-KB936929-SP3-x86-ENU.exe

MD5=
bb25707c919dd835a9d9706b5725af58

SHA-1 hash=
c81472f7eeea2eca421e116cd4c03e2300ebfde4

RTM=Release To Manufacturing

This is the SAME (version 5512)
"Windows XP SP3 final RTM version 5.1.2600.5512"
file as has been available since 24April2008 on the Microsoft website.
See:
http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/70645/#534479
and
http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/topic/70645/#534938


*From Microsoft website, "New" SP3 file:
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=5b33b5a8-5e76-401f-be08-1e1555d4f3d4&DisplayLang=en
Quick Details
File Name: WindowsXP-KB936929-SP3-x86-ENU.exe
Version: 1
Knowledge Base (KB) Articles: KB936929
Date Published: 5/6/2008



edit-add backup reminder and program info
(sorry for multiple clean-up edits...once again on max pain meds...blaacchhh)

duncan bladen May 15, 2008, 12:51pm EDT Reply - Quote - Report Abuse
Send Message - Add to Buddy List  
>> Re: is it me ?
There is NO difference between this "new" SP3 file and the "Windows XP SP3 final RTM version 5.1.2600.5512" file Microsoft first made available 24April2008. i didnt say there was a difference - i was not aware it had previously been released, my pc just picked it up through automatic updates . see the first line of my post again ...i turned my pc on , and it downloaded sp3


john albrich May 15, 2008, 01:59pm EDT Reply - Quote - Report Abuse
Send Message - Add to Buddy List

Edited: May 15, 2008, 02:00pm EDT

 
>> Re: is it me ?
Wasn't making an issue of your post. Sorry for any misunderstanding.

I was trying to emphasize it for those who might have already downloaded the 24April2006 "5512" version by Microsoft (or something in-between). Mainly because it can be a real problem/impossible to back-out an earlier version of an SP and then install a later version.

I wanted people to be absolutely clear they don't need to be concerned that they might have installed a lower version and have a lot of work to do, or might have screwed things up. Confusion can be a problem when we have multiple threads that are related to the same topic.

duncan bladen May 16, 2008, 03:30am EDT Reply - Quote - Report Abuse
Send Message - Add to Buddy List  
>> Re: is it me ?
ok john , i took your post the wrong way , sorry - iwasnt trying to say it was final release - my pc auto updates downloaded it , i took this as being an official download , or i wouldnt have got it ?


DublinGunner May 16, 2008, 04:04am EDT Reply - Quote - Report Abuse
Send Message - Add to Buddy List  
>> Re: is it me ?
duncan bladen said:
ok john , i took your post the wrong way , sorry - iwasnt trying to say it was final release - my pc auto updates downloaded it , i took this as being an official download , or i wouldnt have got it ?



Its been 'officially' released twice. Once about 3 weeks ago, and once again the other day. Apparently there was some sort of security flaw or something, but have obviously decided that it was minor enough to release it again.

E6400 L628 @3.4
Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme
Abit Quad GT
2GB Team Xtreem DDR2-850 4 4 3 10
Leadtek 8800GT 512
OCZ GameXstream
john albrich May 16, 2008, 10:57am EDT Reply - Quote - Report Abuse
Send Message - Add to Buddy List  
>> Re: is it me ?
DublinGunner said:
...Its been 'officially' released twice. Once about 3 weeks ago, and once again the other day. Apparently there was some sort of security flaw or something, but have obviously decided that it was minor enough to release it again.

Oh now that reeeeally makes technical sense...not. What were they thinking? Having the "5573" version "Final version" rumor out there didn't help the matter any, either. Arrrrggh.

Do they make a Bill Gates "Bobble-head"? :/

DublinGunner May 16, 2008, 12:08pm EDT Reply - Quote - Report Abuse
Send Message - Add to Buddy List  
>> Re: is it me ?
Yep, preeeeeeety damn stooopid if you ask me. But thats them boffins for ya!

E6400 L628 @3.4
Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme
Abit Quad GT
2GB Team Xtreem DDR2-850 4 4 3 10
Leadtek 8800GT 512
OCZ GameXstream

Write a Reply >>


 

    
 
 

  Topic Tools 
 
RSS UpdatesRSS Updates
 

  Newsletter 
 
A weekly newsletter featuring an editorial and a roundup of the latest articles, news and other interesting topics.

Please enter your email address below and click Subscribe.