Please register or login. There are 0 registered and 1288 anonymous users currently online. Current bandwidth usage: 326.30 kbit/s December 18 - 05:51am EST 
Hardware Analysis
      
Forums Product Prices
  Contents 
 
 

  Latest Topics 
 

More >>
 

    
 
 

  You Are Here: 
 
/ Forums / Windows Server 2000, 2003, 2008 /
 

  Hardware Recommendation for Win 2003 Server 
 
 Author 
 Date Written 
 Tools 
Trish Sanchez Dec 15, 2008, 09:47am EST Reply - Quote - Report Abuse
Private Message - Add to Buddy List Replies: 4 - Views: 1399
Hello everyone. First let me start off by saying that I am new to this forum but plan to be on here much more often. I am checking something for a friend of a friend for their small business. They want to run 2 servers on Win 2003 server software. 1 server is for sales, finance and IT and the other will run operations, shipping and admin. Cost is a huge issue and the only thing set in concrete is that they will be running 2003 server on both systems. What kind of hardware would you recommend for this?


Want to enjoy fewer advertisements and more features? Click here to become a Hardware Analysis registered user.
Bungle Dec 15, 2008, 10:57am EST Reply - Quote - Report Abuse
Private Message - Add to Buddy List  
>> Re: Hardware Recommendation for Win 2003 Server
The amount of processing power you are going to need is going to depend on how many users will be connecting to the server at any given time. The term "small" business gets thrown around alot but doesn't really say much... how many people work at this company?

Core i7 4770K @ 4.4GHz | Corsair H110 | Gigabyte GA-Z87X-UD5H | 32GB 1866MHz Corsair Vengeance
2x EVGA GTX 780 SLI | 256GB OCZ Vector SSD | 4TB Hitachi 7K4000
Corsair AX1200 PSU | Corsair 650D | Windows 7 Ultimate x64
BoT Dec 15, 2008, 04:07pm EST Reply - Quote - Report Abuse
Private Message - Add to Buddy List  
>> Re: Hardware Recommendation for Win 2003 Server
at least a ball park figure for the budget would be nice too.

why two servers. i think it's better but would like to know the reasoning behind it.

You can either be part of the problem or be part of the solution.
Codisha - http://www.codisha.com
Reviews - http://www.codisha.com/reviews/reviews.htm
Dublin_Gunner Dec 15, 2008, 07:08pm EST Reply - Quote - Report Abuse
Private Message - Add to Buddy List

Edited: Dec 15, 2008, 07:10pm EST

 
>> Re: Hardware Recommendation for Win 2003 Server
Trish Sanchez said:
Hello everyone. First let me start off by saying that I am new to this forum but plan to be on here much more often. I am checking something for a friend of a friend for their small business. They want to run 2 servers on Win 2003 server software. 1 server is for sales, finance and IT and the other will run operations, shipping and admin. Cost is a huge issue and the only thing set in concrete is that they will be running 2003 server on both systems. What kind of hardware would you recommend for this?


If they plan on going with the 2 servers, to me it would seem to make a hell of a lot more sense to organise it this way:

Server 1: Sales, Finance, Admin
Server 2: IT [whatever they mean by that I dont know], operations & shipping.

You say small business, so I assume you're talkin <50 users? If so, for simple file sharing, a pentium 4 would probably do it. I wouldnt imagine a large amount of contiguous connections for an operation like that.

You may want to keep the likes of the e-mail server seperate [i.e Domino running on either win 2003, or even Win 2k would do it].

I know form my own office, that if the e-mail goes down, the business grinds to a halt. [I work for an insurer].

So you could maybe run e-mail & maybe a blackberry server from one machine, you could run all your databases from another [for sales, shipping etc], and one other machine to handle lightweight tasks & file sharing, and possibly use it as thew back up for the others, so at least if they go down, you're data has been saved.

You could run them all off one decent server, but you immediately lose redundancy, and seperation of operation. i.e, if one system goes down, at least the others dont.

As for specs of any of those machines - you dont need a monster at all. Any modeern server grade hardware would do it, or if going on the cheap, you could build some reliable, dual core machines from off the shelf parts, with say 4GiB ram each, and some decent HDD's for a few hundred $$ each.






Lancool PC K62
Phenom II x3 @ 3.5Ghz
4GB DDR2-800
ASUS GTX570 DirectCU II
Rolebama Dec 22, 2008, 09:26am EST Reply - Quote - Report Abuse
Private Message - Add to Buddy List

Edited: Dec 22, 2008, 09:27am EST

 
>> Re: Hardware Recommendation for Win 2003 Server
My recommendation would be to run all services from one server and use the other as a 100% back up, so if things do go wrong, you don't lose anything. Maybe one server and two RAID arrays which could be connected to any machine for data retrieval.


Write a Reply >>


 

    
 
 

  Topic Tools 
 
RSS UpdatesRSS Updates
 

  Related Articles 
 
 

  Newsletter 
 
A weekly newsletter featuring an editorial and a roundup of the latest articles, news and other interesting topics.

Please enter your email address below and click Subscribe.