Please register or login. There are 0 registered and 1137 anonymous users currently online. Current bandwidth usage: 326.30 kbit/s August 02 - 04:35am EDT 
Hardware Analysis
      
Forums Product Prices
  Contents 
 
 

  Latest Topics 
 

More >>
 

    
 
 

  You Are Here: 
 
/ Forums / Monitors /
 

  My New Monitor 
 
 Author 
 Date Written 
 Tools 
Continue Reading on Page: 1, 2, Next >>
Supreet Virdi Jul 06, 2010, 03:59am EDT Reply - Quote - Report Abuse
Private Message - Add to Buddy List Replies: 33 - Views: 1508


____

101% Pure ATI Whoop ASSŪ!!

http://img397.imageshack.us/img397/1715/picture0011ki.jpg
http://img397.imageshack.us/img397/6671/picture0045rp.jpg
Want to enjoy fewer advertisements and more features? Click here to become a Hardware Analysis registered user.
Meats_Of_Evil Jul 06, 2010, 05:25am EDT Reply - Quote - Report Abuse
Private Message - Add to Buddy List  
>> Re: My New Monitor
Wow that thing is huge! How big is it exactly?

Also, does the 16:9 aspect ratio means that the monitor is a littleshorter on the top? It seems that way, or maybe its the angle of the picture.

You're going to be extremely happy now Supreet, Samsung monitors look amazing and now you can game immerse yourself in your Pc games.

^_^

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everything I write is Sarcasm.
Michael C Jul 06, 2010, 08:51am EDT Reply - Quote - Report Abuse
Private Message - Add to Buddy List  
>> Re: My New Monitor
23" and 16:9 is just something you have to get used to, but you'll love it after you do.

Coolermaster HAF932 | Intel SandyBridge 2500K | G.SKILL Ripjaws X F3-12800 8GB | AMD HIS HD6950 2GB | Kingston 64GB V-Series Gen-ll SSD | Gigabyte GA-Z68A-D3H-B3 | Corsair TX-750w | Auzentech X-Fi Forte 7.1
Supreet Virdi Jul 06, 2010, 11:18am EDT Reply - Quote - Report Abuse
Private Message - Add to Buddy List  
>> Re: My New Monitor
It's an excellent monitor, LCDs are generally very expensive in India, but we don't have any choice. :(

Check out reviews about this monitor, its great. Earlier I was planing to get Dell Ultra Sharp 2410WFP. But, I'll be doing something really big by the end of this year, hence this monitor is just for the time being. But I like it so much even being a TN panel it is excellent, more to add it have RED color menu options :D so I might not replace it with Dell Ultra Sharp later on, or lets see how things go.

____

101% Pure ATI Whoop ASSŪ!!

http://img397.imageshack.us/img397/1715/picture0011ki.jpg
http://img397.imageshack.us/img397/6671/picture0045rp.jpg
kOrny Jul 06, 2010, 01:52pm EDT Reply - Quote - Report Abuse
Private Message - Add to Buddy List  
>> Re: My New Monitor
Its crap you got ripped off ;P

Supreet Virdi Jul 07, 2010, 02:00am EDT Reply - Quote - Report Abuse
Private Message - Add to Buddy List  
>> Re: My New Monitor
Shut the fcuk up!

____

101% Pure ATI Whoop ASSŪ!!

http://img397.imageshack.us/img397/1715/picture0011ki.jpg
http://img397.imageshack.us/img397/6671/picture0045rp.jpg
G. G. Jul 07, 2010, 02:16am EDT Reply - Quote - Report Abuse
Private Message - Add to Buddy List  
>> Re: My New Monitor
LOL..... he's mess'n with you.... :P


Nice monitor... but personally I like 16:10 for computer use.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-
<a class= Jul 07, 2010, 02:26am EDT Reply - Quote - Report Abuse
Private Message - Add to Buddy List  
>> Re: My New Monitor
Nice monitor... but personally I like 16:10 for computer use.


^ What he said.

_______________________________________________________
3930K @ 5.00Ghz | GA-X79-UD3P | 16Gb DDR3 | GTX770 | W7 x64
Jul 07, 2010, 02:27am EDT Reply - Quote - Report Abuse
Private Message - Add to Buddy List  
>> Re: My New Monitor
Michael C (34292) said on Jul 06, 2010 at 05:51am PDT:
16:9 is just something you have to get used to, but you'll love it after you do.

F**k 16:9 (for monitors). 16:10 is perfect. Luckily a few manufacturers still realize this.

G. G. (24435) said on Jul 06, 2010 at 11:16pm PDT:
but personally I like 16:10 for computer use.

Indeed.

Nice upgrade though, Suprizzle. But ... XP? :~

Supreet Virdi Jul 07, 2010, 08:55am EDT Reply - Quote - Report Abuse
Private Message - Add to Buddy List  
>> Re: My New Monitor
McFly said:
Michael C (34292) said on Jul 06, 2010 at 05:51am PDT:
16:9 is just something you have to get used to, but you'll love it after you do.

F**k 16:9 (for monitors). 16:10 is perfect. Luckily a few manufacturers still realize this.

G. G. (24435) said on Jul 06, 2010 at 11:16pm PDT:
but personally I like 16:10 for computer use.

Indeed.

Nice upgrade though, Suprizzle. But ... XP? :~


Tell me five good reasons why choose 16:10 over 16:9 monitor. Though I have future plans I might upgrade to Dell UltraSharp 2410WFP, which is 16:10. But first of all tell me the reasons why 16:10 instead of 16:9.

____

101% Pure ATI Whoop ASSŪ!!

http://img397.imageshack.us/img397/1715/picture0011ki.jpg
http://img397.imageshack.us/img397/6671/picture0045rp.jpg
mothow Jul 07, 2010, 10:11am EDT Reply - Quote - Report Abuse
Private Message - Add to Buddy List  
>> Re: My New Monitor
Samsung makes very good monitors..I've looked into that line myself but was looking at the 25.5 incher.

Asrock Z97 Extreme 4 / i7 4790K / Corsair H80i / 4x4GB Crucial Ballistix Smart Tracer DDR3 1600 / 1TB Western Digital Caviar Black / 240GB Mushkin Chronos Deluxe SSD / 2x Evga GTX 670 FTW 2GB in SLI / Sound Blaster Recon3D Fatal1ty / Corsair HX1000w
Michael C Jul 07, 2010, 10:24am EDT Reply - Quote - Report Abuse
Private Message - Add to Buddy List  
>> Re: My New Monitor
Yeah, really. I've had more monitors than I can count and I can't really say 16:10 is better. Actually I'd say 16:9 is better because it doesn't squash 1080p images(blu-rays).

Coolermaster HAF932 | Intel SandyBridge 2500K | G.SKILL Ripjaws X F3-12800 8GB | AMD HIS HD6950 2GB | Kingston 64GB V-Series Gen-ll SSD | Gigabyte GA-Z68A-D3H-B3 | Corsair TX-750w | Auzentech X-Fi Forte 7.1
Jul 07, 2010, 11:09am EDT Reply - Quote - Report Abuse
Private Message - Add to Buddy List

Edited: Jul 07, 2010, 11:16am EDT

 
>> Re: My New Monitor
Supreet Virdi (24355) said on Jul 07, 2010 at 05:55am PDT:
Tell me five good reasons why choose 16:10 over 16:9 monitor.

I don't need 5, I only need one: it's a better ratio. :)

Michael C (34292) said on Jul 07, 2010 at 07:24am PDT:
Yeah, really. I've had more monitors than I can count and I can't really say 16:10 is better. Actually I'd say 16:9 is better because it doesn't squash 1080p images(blu-rays).

If it's 'squashing' anything, you're doing it wrong. 1080p on a 16:10 monitor at 1920x1200 should show as letterbox, with two 60px black bars.

That's great that you watch movies on your computer all day (I have no idea why, that's what TV's are for), but for people who actually use their computer for something other than playing games and watching movies while eating pizza pockets (design, programming, etc.), making everything ridiculously wide serves no purpose.

Michael C Jul 07, 2010, 11:35am EDT Reply - Quote - Report Abuse
Private Message - Add to Buddy List

Edited: Jul 07, 2010, 11:40am EDT

 
>> Re: My New Monitor
So you're saying 16:10 is(much)better for doing things other than playing games and watching movies? Using programs like Microsoft Office, programming and web browsing appear better on 16:10 for example? How is that possible? What advantages are you getting by having 16:10 over 16:9? After you look at the screen long enough you can't notice the difference anyways.

I use my PS3 on my monitor sometimes and it generally scales better on 16:9 for everything, and you can't change the way PS3 games scale.

I had a 16:10 monitor for months and didn't find any advantages over 16:9. I love 16:9 now. I'd have to say that the difference between the two is very small and there's no reason not to get one or the other.

Coolermaster HAF932 | Intel SandyBridge 2500K | G.SKILL Ripjaws X F3-12800 8GB | AMD HIS HD6950 2GB | Kingston 64GB V-Series Gen-ll SSD | Gigabyte GA-Z68A-D3H-B3 | Corsair TX-750w | Auzentech X-Fi Forte 7.1
Jul 07, 2010, 12:05pm EDT Reply - Quote - Report Abuse
Private Message - Add to Buddy List  
>> Re: My New Monitor
Michael C (34292) said on Jul 07, 2010 at 08:35am PDT:
How is that possible?

Now, with 16:10 and 16:9, the difference isn't that much, but I suppose I was referring more to the general trend of making everything about computers designed for multimedia, at the expense of productivity. (I'm still p**sed about HP trying to turn their EliteBook line into MacBooks). Sorry.

Michael C (34292) said on Jul 07, 2010 at 08:35am PDT:
I'd have to say that the difference between the two is very small and there's no reason not to get one or the other.

Maybe ... maybe not. Either way, in the end, given the choice, I'd take an otherwise-equal 16:10 over 16:9 every time.

I suspect you guys will be the first to jump on board and advocate the new 16:5 screen ratio in a few years. :P

Supreet Virdi Jul 07, 2010, 12:06pm EDT Reply - Quote - Report Abuse
Private Message - Add to Buddy List  
>> Re: My New Monitor
Do you guys even have a clue about 16:10? I'm sorry for being sarcastic, but not offense please. It "hardly" makes any difference in real life.

Check out this post:

[b]
A 16:10 monitor of any size will permit you more vertical space, so if the web-pages you tend to visit are long, there will be less scrolling. If you're looking at a 24" monitor, then a 16:10 display is wide enough to hold two full size word documents with a bit to spare, so unless you need anything wider than that, 16:10 is plenty wide. On small monitors, though, the added width of 16:9 could be helpful in viewing multiple open windows.
and in both cases, the 16:9 ratio tends to be better for modern media, however if you watch old TV shows much (4:3) there will be quiet a bit of black space on the two sides,
and a hardcore gamer should decide if it's PC gaming or console gaming. PC Games will be able to use the extra resolution of a 16:10 (1920x1200) on a 24" monitor but consoles only 16:9 aspect ratios. Not all games currently have 16:9 support, though many do. and if that's your priority and you plan on playing on both PC and console, 16:9 may be more beneficial.

http://hardforum.com/showpost.php?p=1033336685&postcount=2
http://hardforum.com/showthread.php?t=1366879


____

101% Pure ATI Whoop ASSŪ!!

http://img397.imageshack.us/img397/1715/picture0011ki.jpg
http://img397.imageshack.us/img397/6671/picture0045rp.jpg
Jul 07, 2010, 12:21pm EDT Reply - Quote - Report Abuse
Private Message - Add to Buddy List  
>> Re: My New Monitor
No offense Supreet, but "hardly makes a difference" isn't the same as "doesn't make a difference."

Obviously it a personal preference, but as you yourself just posted, 16:9 is mostly beneficial for games and movies. 16:9 was designed for movies, so obviously it works well there, but it offers a disadvantage when doing desktop work, in the form of less vertical resolution (you might consider it a smaller disadvantage than others do).

On the converse, 16:10 offers the disadvantage when watching movies, in the form of two 60px black bars at 1080p, or two 40px black bars at 720p. I consider the black bars much less of a nuisance than the decreased desktop space, so I choose 16:10.

And let's not forget that you lose 10% of your raw pixel count with 16:9 relative to the corresponding 16:10 resolution.

G. G. Jul 07, 2010, 12:30pm EDT Reply - Quote - Report Abuse
Private Message - Add to Buddy List

Edited: Jul 07, 2010, 12:34pm EDT

 
>> Re: My New Monitor
Supreet,

when it comes to 16:10 or 16:9, it boils down to ones preferrence or what you are used to.

me personally I like 16:10 when it comes to computer viewing. It gives me a little bit more vertical space and for my eyes, imo, seems more proportionally even when it comes to working with everything else other than movies. When I am on a monitor that is a 16:9..... everything seems squished vertically.. The image is not actually squished but my eyes can tell there is less space to view i.e. desktop and within applications. Now if someone was using 16:9 from the get go or that is their promident use of monitors, then they would not have an issue with it. When it comes to movies, 16:9 is better fitted .... just as long as you dont change the players aspect ratio to i.e. zoom, pan, vertical fit, horizontal fit, etc..... you still get the little black bars above and below, just not as big as on a 16:10. It's when you start to change the viewing type that can get distorted in different ways.


So if you want a monitor that is either 16:10 or 16:9, dont let one or the other stop you.

As mentioned, computer monitors are heading towards the 16:9 ratio due to multimedia... but 16:10 is the ratio for computers when "widescreen" started in the beginning coming from the norm 4:3 ratio.

oh by the way... with less vertical space in a 16:9 format vs 16:10, the space loss is more effected with smaller screen size than with larger screen.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-
Michael C Jul 07, 2010, 01:10pm EDT Reply - Quote - Report Abuse
Private Message - Add to Buddy List  
>> Re: My New Monitor
Thankfully the resolution difference is mimimal:

16:10 - 1920x1200
16:9 - 1920x1080

Who's going to notice those 120 pixels?

Coolermaster HAF932 | Intel SandyBridge 2500K | G.SKILL Ripjaws X F3-12800 8GB | AMD HIS HD6950 2GB | Kingston 64GB V-Series Gen-ll SSD | Gigabyte GA-Z68A-D3H-B3 | Corsair TX-750w | Auzentech X-Fi Forte 7.1
G. G. Jul 07, 2010, 01:24pm EDT Reply - Quote - Report Abuse
Private Message - Add to Buddy List  
>> Re: My New Monitor
Michael C said:

Who's going to notice those 120 pixels?



ummmm.... I can michael... :D

movies, yes, 16:9 works better.... but for everything else it just seems there is a loss in real estate that is noticable. well for me that is.... and that is coming from working on 16:10 much longer than 16:9 monitors.

As McFly mentioned, larger bars in movies is much more of a lesser evil over loosing real estate within desktop and application.

for others, it wont matter...

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-
Jul 07, 2010, 01:40pm EDT Reply - Quote - Report Abuse
Private Message - Add to Buddy List

Edited: Jul 07, 2010, 01:44pm EDT

 
>> Re: My New Monitor
Michael C (34292) said on Jul 07, 2010 at 10:10am PDT:
16:10 - 1920x1200
16:9 - 1920x1080

Who's going to notice those 120 pixels?

Umm, it's only 120px in height that's missing. 120px across the entire 1920px of screen width adds up to 1920x120 = 230400px.

Who's going to notice more than 230-thousand pixels? Me.

That's a 480px square image [(1920*1200)-(1920*1080)=480^2]:
http://i29.tinypic.com/4zvpmt.png

I'd call that significant.


Write a Reply >>

Continue Reading on Page: 1, 2, Next >>

 

    
 
 

  Topic Tools 
 
RSS UpdatesRSS Updates
 

  Related Articles 
 
 

  Newsletter 
 
A weekly newsletter featuring an editorial and a roundup of the latest articles, news and other interesting topics.

Please enter your email address below and click Subscribe.