Please register or login. There are 0 registered and 799 anonymous users currently online. Current bandwidth usage: 326.30 kbit/s November 30 - 07:01pm EST 
Hardware Analysis
      
Forums Product Prices
  Contents 
 
 

  Latest Topics 
 

More >>
 

    
 
 

  You Are Here: 
 
/ Forums / Half-Life 2, all you need to know when upgrading
 

  Benchmark results, continued 
 
 Author 
 Date Written 
 Tools 
Sander Sassen Nov 30, 2004, 03:32am EST Report Abuse
I got some emails requesting I post some scores from a system featuring a high-end videocard, all that I have is a X800XT PE AGP, I can't comment on X850 PE scores yet, I've posted the scores below for your reference:

1024x768 : medium quality
demo_001 : 107.91
demo_002 : 68.50
demo_003 : 104.05
demo_004 : 49.80

1280x1024 : medium quality
demo_001 : 103.97
demo_002 : 65.98
demo_003 : 100.74
demo_004 : 49.94

1600x1200 : medium quality
demo_001 : 92.64
demo_002 : 63.54
demo_003 : 88.99
demo_004 : 48.69

1600x1200 : HIGH QUALITY
demo_001 : 67.82
demo_002 : 44.61
demo_003 : 49.58
demo_004 : 40.15

This system can be pushed a little further of course, when I run the processor at 3.60GHz, 225x16, and the AGP at 75MHz, with the X800XT PE at 560/590 (520/560 stock) you get the following score:

1600x1200 : HIGH QUALITY
demo_001 : 76.92
demo_002 : 62.33
demo_003 : 54.04
demo_004 : 53.16


Sander Sassen
Editor in Chief - Hardware Analysis
ssassen@hardwareanalysis.com
Want to enjoy fewer advertisements and more features? Click here to become a Hardware Analysis registered user.
Miguel Diab Nov 30, 2004, 10:01pm EST Report Abuse
>> Re: Benchmark results, continued
Even when I found the article good, and the idea that Valve's programming skills were so into the game that developed a highly eficient game under mid range video cards, I still think that CPU requirementes should be taken more into account. 76% of valve subscribers have a system that's below the 2.7Gz mark (or 2700+) And if they will like to upgrade the CPU it will be to a top mark of 3.2Gz unless changing the whole arquitecture (in my case a Socket A A7n8X Deluxe). Then when taking into account memory requirements we see that 512Mb to 1Gb is the standrad, and that really matters when thinking of loading time (avoiding the disk cache as much as possible between loading sections) but still there is no reflection to that issue on the article. And lastly, the GPU's that most subscribers have (and due to the fact that there is 1M subscribers as reference I can say is a quantity large enough to take it as a standard average of gamers around the globe) range from GeForce 4 and 4MX on the nVidia side, and 9600 to 9800 on the ATi side (summing 41.5% of all GPU's, and almost 30% is of GeForce5x00 and other 9x00 models) Which means that, this cards should be the main focus. I used to have a 9600XT and sold it now and put back my old ATi 7000 (and HL2 runs), but soon upgrade to 6800 or 6600GT, but I don't want to think that my XP 2700+ with 1Gb of Dual memory will score the same with the 6800 as when I had the 9600XT. Too bad I don't have my old card to test now, but as soon as I get the 6800, I will post the results and see what happens. Cheers.
Mike

Freak Head Nov 30, 2004, 10:24pm EST Report Abuse
>> Re: Benchmark results, continued
Well I did some tests and posted them in the other thread. I found that a 9700 pro paired with an AMD 2500xp cpu got twice the fps that the author in the article got with a 9600xt and a P4 2.4 ghz cpu. And while he found that adding a x800 pro did nothing for him I found that adding a 9700 pro to a cpu roughly equivalent of a P4 did alot.

And you're right about loading time and memory for HL2. I had 512MB in my machine. Loading times were insane. I popped in 256MB more and boom they were cut at least in half, I'd even say more like 75%.




Greg M Nov 30, 2004, 10:28pm EST Report Abuse
>> Re: Benchmark results, continued
Well, does anyone here have a SLI system with which to test on HL2?

If nobody does, I volunteer (sp?) my system for a little time with this game... (I'm going to have to re-play it with a good system anyway...) The problem is, it wont be in for another 2 weeks :( !

----
FX-55, 2x 1GB GSkill, X1800XT (512MB), 2x250GB RAID-0, DFI SLI-D
http://www.gandmpc.com <-My 'project'
http://www.knownpsycho.com <-Web games!
Greg M Dec 01, 2004, 06:43pm EST Report Abuse
>> Re: Benchmark results, continued

ERROR: demo network protocol 6 outdated, engine version is 7
Failed to read demo header.


Thats all I get when I try to use the demos.

Any suggestions?

----
FX-55, 2x 1GB GSkill, X1800XT (512MB), 2x250GB RAID-0, DFI SLI-D
http://www.gandmpc.com <-My 'project'
http://www.knownpsycho.com <-Web games!
Sander Sassen Dec 02, 2004, 01:49am EST Report Abuse
>> Re: Benchmark results, continued
You downloaded the new Steam update which breaks all demos and saved games, I already emailed them about it to get a fix, if at all possible.

Sander Sassen
Editor in Chief - Hardware Analysis
ssassen@hardwareanalysis.com
Herbert Chin Feb 24, 2005, 07:48pm EST Report Abuse
>> Re: Benchmark results, continued
Well, it looks like Steam still hasn't done anything to make the Time demo's work. I just tried and got "Couldn't open file...for reading". Know any other benchmarks for HL2 I can try?



 

    
 
 

  Topic Tools 
 
RSS UpdatesRSS Updates
 

  Related Articles 
 
 

  Newsletter 
 
A weekly newsletter featuring an editorial and a roundup of the latest articles, news and other interesting topics.

Please enter your email address below and click Subscribe.