Please register or login. There are 0 registered and 815 anonymous users currently online. Current bandwidth usage: 326.30 kbit/s October 17 - 06:29pm EDT 
Hardware Analysis
Forums Product Prices

  Latest Topics 

More >>


  You Are Here: 
/ Forums / ATIís R520 architecture, the new king of the hill?

  the truth is out 
 Date Written 
b0b d0le Oct 05, 2005, 01:14pm EDT Report Abuse
these scores don't even come close to matching up. Splinter Cell is the best example.

Where is the X1800 Pro? It's not listed on any of the reviews :(

Sander, how did you come up with these numbers? They seem so arbitrary. Did you just pull them out of a hat, or did write the numbers that came first to your mind.? You can go ahead and cite your "custom benchmarks" as the reason why the benchmarks are different but anyone with a brain will see through this thin veil of bullshit you spew.

Want to enjoy fewer advertisements and more features? Click here to become a Hardware Analysis registered user.
Sander Sassen Oct 05, 2005, 01:18pm EDT Report Abuse
>> Re: the truth is out
Welcome Bob, I see this is you first post here, and what a great post it is. Want me to reply, or will you just stick to the defacto 'you suc0k3r, bi4tch'?


Sander Sassen
Editor in Chief - Hardware Analysis
Shadow_Ops_Airman1 Oct 05, 2005, 01:19pm EDT Report Abuse
>> Re: the truth is out
remove the spammer

AMD Athlon XP-M 2500+ (133x14= 1867MHz) (209x11= 2299MHz)
DFI LP NF2 Ultra-B (Hellfire 3EG Rev2)
Antec SX800, Neo HE 500, 4 Antec 8CM Fans
Thermalright SI-97 1 Antec Tricool 12CM Fan
CL SB XFi Xtreme Music
2x Barracuda HDs (250/400)
2x Samsung Write
Dublin_Gunner Oct 05, 2005, 01:22pm EDT Report Abuse
>> Re: the truth is out
He does realise that the cards are on a completely different rig, hence the scores are different.

The scores are almost a carbon copy of the relationship of the scores in Sander's review.

Get this idiot out of here, he abviously does not have a clue about anything.

Lancool PC K62
Phenom II x3 @ 3.5Ghz
4GB DDR2-800
b0b d0le Oct 05, 2005, 03:35pm EDT Report Abuse
>> Re: the truth is out
Sander, explain why these benchmarks do not correlate with the other X1800XT scores that are available. Why are yours so wildly different?

sven Oct 05, 2005, 03:50pm EDT Report Abuse
>> Re: the truth is out
No sander seriously, kick this spamming idiot out! Hes prolly just some Ati fanboy from a no name forum that was sent here by the two other ppl on the forum to start something.

I say boot his ass and let that be the end of it.

to b0b (or whatever the hell your lame ass 1337 name is) : Get A f**kin Life and go back to wherever the hell you came from!

Lawrence Heffernan Oct 05, 2005, 03:52pm EDT Report Abuse
>> Re: the truth is out
b0b d0le, explain why you give a damn

b0b d0le Oct 05, 2005, 04:42pm EDT Report Abuse
>> Re: the truth is out
Lawerence, maybe you should ask Sander why he cares so much that he's willing to fabricate false R520 benchmarks.

guru Shane Oct 05, 2005, 04:51pm EDT Report Abuse
>> Re: the truth is out
The results look similar to me. :) ATI said that there would be a very clear difference between the x1800 xt and the 7800 gtx. Where is the difference? I can't see it. If anything, the 7800 gtx looks better.

ian elliott Oct 06, 2005, 02:47pm EDT Report Abuse
>> Re: the truth is out
The moral of the story is don't count your chickens before they are hatched.

or don't count your benchmarks before you have the cards.



  Topic Tools 
RSS UpdatesRSS Updates

  Related Articles 

A weekly newsletter featuring an editorial and a roundup of the latest articles, news and other interesting topics.

Please enter your email address below and click Subscribe.