Please register or login. There are 0 registered and 713 anonymous users currently online. Current bandwidth usage: 326.30 kbit/s September 20 - 03:44am EDT 
Hardware Analysis
      
Forums Product Prices
  Contents 
 
 

  Latest Topics 
 

More >>
 

    
 
 

  You Are Here: 
 
/ Forums / Videocards /
 

  PCGEEK takes on ATI X1800XT 512 & scores BIG 
 
 Author 
 Date Written 
 Tools 
Continue Reading on Page: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24
<a class= Jan 15, 2006, 02:53pm EST Report Abuse
>> Re: PCGEEK takes on ATI X1800XT 512 & scores BIG
Nice, dang, why didn't I get a crossfire mobo and a X1800XT :P

_______________________________________________________
3930K @ 5.00Ghz | GA-X79-UD3P | 16Gb DDR3 | GTX770 | W7 x64
Want to enjoy less advertisements and more features? Click here to become a Hardware Analysis registered user.
Michael A. Jan 15, 2006, 03:15pm EST Report Abuse
>> Re: PCGEEK takes on ATI X1800XT 512 & scores BIG

Michael A.
Website: http://itnode.net
Pirate Jan 15, 2006, 03:18pm EST Report Abuse
>> Re: PCGEEK takes on ATI X1800XT 512 & scores BIG
Yes, what Michael said. I know I'm not the most mature member here, but some of you guys take far too seriously. I can't believe some of you are grown men.

Smoking heads because of a dumb argument. LOL.

SuPeR Xp Jan 15, 2006, 10:12pm EST Report Abuse
>> Re: PCGEEK takes on ATI X1800XT 512 & scores BIG
Predator, no offence, but ask yourself why NVIDIA requires 24 "Pixel Pipelines" to compete with ATI's 16 "Pixel Pipelines" ???

Need I say more? And I didn't bad mouth NVIDIA at all, so why are you so eager in defending something which needs no defending in the first place yeee?

That is if you think NVIDIA's GTX's can't handle the heat of competition right? Well, that is how you sound when making comments like that :)

-------------------------------------------------
Custom AMD HAF 932 Red Dragon GAMING MOD!!!
http://www.techpowerup.com/gallery/2442.html
Predator Jan 15, 2006, 10:34pm EST Report Abuse
>> Re: PCGEEK takes on ATI X1800XT 512 & scores BIG
It needs defending, because all you ATI fans do is bash...oh wait, nvm...you just say ATI is superior in EVERY FREAKING WAY.

"Predator, no offence, but ask yourself why NVIDIA requires 24 "Pixel Pipelines" to compete with ATI's 16 "Pixel Pipelines" ???"

SuperXP, no offence, but ask yourself why ATI requires 625/1500 (actually, about 700/1800 because that's what it takes PCGEEK's X1800 to defeat a 7800GTX256) to compete with NVIDIA's 430/1200 (256MB 7800GTX)?

AMD Athlon 64 3000+ Venice
DFI LanParty UT nForce4 Ultra-D

New Forum: http://www.cyberitforums.com
john caps Jan 15, 2006, 11:07pm EST Report Abuse
>> Re: PCGEEK takes on ATI X1800XT 512 & scores BIG
where can i find this "ATI X1800XT"?

or do you have any to give?

john caps Jan 15, 2006, 11:09pm EST Report Abuse
>> Re: PCGEEK takes on ATI X1800XT 512 & scores BIG
where can i find this "ATI X1800XT"?

or do you have any to give?

that is better than ATI RADEON 9250 128 mb cos my card sucks on performance

<a class= Jan 15, 2006, 11:09pm EST Report Abuse
>> Re: PCGEEK takes on ATI X1800XT 512 & scores BIG
I can tell you all one thing. When one "believes" that say, for example, ATI is better than nVidia, when he comes across the information which supports his belief, he will definately interpret it in support of his belief, proving once again that he hinks right. Nothing, and I mean NOTHING can change what the other person believes, unless he himself decides to question his belief and look for an aswer of what is right or wrong somewhere else. So whether you get what I am saying or not, when the two people argue and each one of them tries to prove to another that he is right, it is quite pointless. Look at this example. Some dude said that the 256meg GTX beats the X1800XT, at which another person just laughed. At the tomshardware (don't question the legitimacy of the source at this point) they show that in FEAR the 256meg GTX gets better FPS than the X1800XT. The person who believes that nvidia is better interpretes the info as if the 256meg GTX is better than the XT. The person who believe that the XT is better interpetes the same piece of the information as if the source is a buch of B.S. because prehaps somwhere else he saw other numbers or something. I am just showing an example here. Both looked at th same thing yes interpreting it to their belief. So no way you can "prove" one right or wrong because if the other person believes something, no matter what you throw at them, will be interpreted my him in his advantage. Accoring to what the other believes. I don't know if you get what I am saying or not...

_______________________________________________________
3930K @ 5.00Ghz | GA-X79-UD3P | 16Gb DDR3 | GTX770 | W7 x64
Michael C Jan 15, 2006, 11:33pm EST Report Abuse
>> Re: PCGEEK takes on ATI X1800XT 512 & scores BIG
Some James guy in another thread posted these scores with a 7800GTX, better than yours PCGEEK.

New scores:

3DMark 03 - 27,946
3DMark 05 - 11,315

SuPeR Xp Jan 16, 2006, 03:36am EST Report Abuse
>> Re: PCGEEK takes on ATI X1800XT 512 & scores BIG
Just to clarify some FACT boys, the X1800XT 512MB @ stock speeds vs. 7800GTX 256MB @ stock speeds compete well with each other with the ATI leading by a small margin.

So, Predator, I don't know where you are getting your info from, but I would question your resources before posting stuff. The only card which can beat the X1800XT 512MB is the GTX 512MB version O.K. that is it.

And when you OC the X1800XT 512MB, it's a close race ;)

-------------------------------------------------
Custom AMD HAF 932 Red Dragon GAMING MOD!!!
http://www.techpowerup.com/gallery/2442.html
PCGEEK Jan 16, 2006, 03:46am EST Report Abuse
>> Re: PCGEEK takes on ATI X1800XT 512 & scores BIG
After discussing this with mike . Because of the countless arguments and pointless fights about video cards . I have asked him to save the useful info about the X1800XT 512 and delete the rest and lock this down.

In the future I hope that you all will practice a little more control . Video card is just that . A video card. Good or not all that matters is the hard evidence and facts and useful info posted by the person who owns it and tests it to a full extent. Personnel feelings or beliefs forced on others and pointless flam wars just make us all look bad and diminish from the integrity of HWA.

I will soon be doing a new look into the 7900 GTX or X1900XTX I have not decided yet what one. Ill wait and see who offers the better package. When I do. Ill ask that we keep this clean next time. Gets old asking Mike to keep coming back . As for me. I can care less . I like Nvidia and ATI . Each have served me well in the past. I'm done with these flame wars .

Ill stick to hard facts my self

SuPeR Xp Jan 16, 2006, 05:25am EST Report Abuse
>> Re: PCGEEK takes on ATI X1800XT 512 & scores BIG
Great Points PCGEEK :)

There is nothing like real hard facts.

-------------------------------------------------
Custom AMD HAF 932 Red Dragon GAMING MOD!!!
http://www.techpowerup.com/gallery/2442.html

This thread has been locked by forum moderators and no further posts are allowed.

Continue Reading on Page: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24

 

    
 
 

  Topic Tools 
 
RSS UpdatesRSS Updates
 

  Related Articles 
 
 

  Newsletter 
 
A weekly newsletter featuring an editorial and a roundup of the latest articles, news and other interesting topics.

Please enter your email address below and click Subscribe.